FEED ... Then there
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN PUBLIC SERVANTS.
enshrined in Article 6 of the Constitution, the right to free expression of ideas is subject to all Mexicans, without exception. This includes civil servants irrespective of the level of government in providing services. However, for companies that are still very far from being consolidated as democracies, this exercise will fly an ongoing risk.
What is the treatment that may be a public servant which make use of that law and public opinions expressed criticism for not using official information considered classified?
public is that public servants can and few do not, publish laudatory views of public policy, a program, project or simply for the operation of an area of \u200b\u200bgovernment.
The question is, can do the same if their views are contrary to the praise, exercise critical analysis or the indication of failure, arbitrariness, inefficiency, dishonesty or simple disfuncionalides public administration? We know that this can be - and even encourage or reward - as long as the object of criticism is another government not one in which we work.
really a public servant who in addition to his service in the public exercised their constitutional right to freedom of expression through essays or articles, may be subject to censorship to lose their jobs, but especially if their opinions involving critique of some aspect of government in which they work.
're gonna run! It was the most frequent warning friends and family "I bought my services are not my conscience," he replied in a tone that differs from the one I gave the agent of the public prosecutor 42 years ago in a corridor of Preventive Jail Lecumberri.
So I tell my children that I use daily challenge to sufficiency of ideas and the first phase of its review. I feel the generation gap and I reiterate my respect at the same time I demand respect my right to think, then proceed as in fulfillment of my duties as a father supplier, critique and alternate proposal awards - if any - who think they deserve it .
A form of concession - paid if preferred, much less frequent than praise columnists newsletter that is not changed or periods or commas.
However, I've always been a responsible father of their obligations as being a public servant and writer, is a weekly challenge. People who invite me to care what I say I told you that freedom of speech is life. Cogito ergo sum
However the risk of being accused of "disloyalty" is permanent. Fundamentalist mentality that everything is reduced to the binomial friend - there are enemy to the best of us! It is unfair to the question "who? "The head or the institution? It is understood that a slight period of analysis could easily put the accuser in the role of defendant.
But the most severe censorship, censorship or outright suppression of the exercise of freedom of expression for public servants is that their cost is paid by the company under the civil service is operated by humans and constantly exposed to all kinds of deformities and dysfunctions cyclical whims or simple lags and positive criticism loses ruling and the proposal is better evidence than those who live and work involved in government agencies.
"I wonder what kind of" reengineering "of government or administrative modernization can be in a government that is able to listen to their own employees?
Is that there are still leaders who believe that the proper conduct of a depends only on talent management and the capacity of their heads? No doubt that's good. But .... and the hundreds of thousands of technicians and professionals who are below what? Are they mindless beings who think, they have no ideas how to improve the administration? Please never heard more stupid!
Governments do not listen and dialogue with the reflective thinking of their own servers make public administration an "intensive care ward" where human creativity dying precisely because there is no political will to establish as legitimate freedom of opinion or channels to listen and make efficient ideas and proposals. For rulers so selfish and authoritarian, in the public service only "drainers" think.
And being human, the ruler is like any other, ie one unit. The same in your family at work or to the whole society. The cost of these ways of exercising power have been in the "democracies" and not say during the dictatorships of all colors. When the disagreement and dissent spread, are governments that still have to go to the simulation but it is increasingly more difficult levels of reflective awareness and information to those who have reached many citizens.
With over 30 years of public servant, my life is a critical periodicals pleasure explaining the experiment to study the Master of the IAP, a prestigious academic institution that encourages the study of public administration without censorship of any kind. But today I heard one of my teachers say that freedom of expression is a right whose fulfillment is gained only when no longer financially dependent on the government "and added" in my 60 years, I can say whatever he wants, "I do errands. "
I was shocked by who said it, nothing less than a public servant of unquestionable experience in the federal government, the state of Veracruz and national prestige within an area of \u200b\u200bexpertise has allowed him to know the depths of power. Admirable
the position of my teacher but ... .. Poor Mexico! Never have efficient government as the exercise of patrimonial power is repressing the creative thinking of its workers and prevents these the development of a genuine political culture of service!
Poor Mexico whose servers and especially men of talent have to wait for retirement to say freely what they think of government, of how we can improve!
is a pity that political parties in power - because they are all in power are incapable of building a reflective dialogue with the rulers. It is a pity that these organizations have earned the image of officers and employees of the ruler. Electoral machines. False so be all over the world!
I stay with the militancy of convictions in which right or wrong, I trained in my youth!
Our company policy - green, yellow, red and blue, is sick. The symptoms on power and privileges. The discrediting of politicians born when the treasury began to pay for that activity. That
political society must sooner or later face an aroused citizenry, not just well-informed without being too suspicious and discerning the meaning behind excessive praise or defamation.
The constructive dialogue between government and civil servants is no more question of "personal style of government" but of whether or not you have a vision of the state of public administration. See that we come across in modern times. Comments are welcome.
http://despertartemprano.blogspot.com/
Email: romeo-gonzalez@hotmail.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment