HEARINGS:
FACES AND USELESS!
while ago that this mechanism for dialogue between the executive and the legislature has been widely questioned and identified at least ineffective.
not resist the smallest objective analysis. It found that reform is needed to truly fulfill the oversight function and responsibility between two powers, and depart from the simulation in which the members do as they question and secretaries "show" who know best - if not answer - but in the end, everyone says "be happy" leaving for chronic paid, to the applause of the cheers as the "formal" swearing-in session.
Physically it is impossible for a legislature that is entering a thorough understanding of programming and the results of each and every one of the sectors of state administration. What was done and what was not done in each of the 212 municipalities and the thousands of locations throughout the territory of the state?
Members, besides attending to his legislative work in committee or in plenary, only manage to have a superficial or partial progress of the program government and to question or discuss what was done or poorly done in a municipality or region, in no way implies that we know generally the policy and program management sector. Far
or almost never get to know the interaction and interdependence of these programs cross. So the deputies wonder why no one has said that the tree is known about the forest.
Moreover, most members lack professional training and that is another limitation. They are just 30 days of taking office and a training phase. Everyone knows that because of that have to be lobbying advisers prior to each secretary can at least ask some questions seriously.
What is the purpose of these meetings? Why it the hearings? Do not say that to "extend" the GOVERNMENT REPORT THIS BECAUSE IT'S MORE THAN BIG REVEAL QUESTIONS.
serve to advertise the flowers from fellow exhibitor or to hear representations from their districts from other party lawmakers. Serve to increase or decrease the score of the political career of the secretaries or deputies.
How to explain that a Member ask a question and the clerk replied in the second person singular by reading a statement prepared in advance? I do not mean hard data but true reading no secret scrolls have been made to measure. No care or appearance! Please gentlemen and end this farce! In the end, all members said they are "broadly satisfied" and Veracruz it be? I doubt it, well that Members would agree to an opinion poll about the perception that citizens have of these practices.
The hearings of the secretaries to the committees of the Legislature of the State are referred to in Article 51 of the Constitution of the State of Veracruz, which literally says: "The heads of the agencies and government entities public, will appear before Congress to call it expresses, through the Governor, to account for the state to keep the agencies in charge, and when discussing a law or consideration of a business relative to their respective branches or activities "
This mandate and the hearings that have taken place have actually served, not for what the Constitution says. Events have served to actors and free publicity, because that time is used to boast of managers courage or political patter on one side, or to assume success side of the secretaries.
Our deputies do not have to think to give an account of saved state agencies like the Constitution says, is something that is already with more detail in the written report and annexes that delivers the Governor in print. To begin with the Constitution is wrong because the noun is not the state of the premises, these are just administrative instruments, what matters are the investments, programs and also about this is that members get to throw some questions. This is an obvious inaccuracy of the Constituent. But let's leave that for later.
If the point is in the documentation that the governor delivered, what it is, then the hearings? The most repeated argument focuses on the side of surrender accountability and transparency and the right of the legislature to be held accountable. But it so happens that the instruments of control are properly regulated and are of a specialized nature, hence the local and federal legislature have a law - the control - a technical body - in our case is the ORFISA - and regular obligations established as the Public Accounts and more.
why I say that is false appearances that have served for the legislature to exercise prosecutorial functions quite simply because neither are made for that (for that is the ORFISA, with an army of accountants and experts that cost millions of public funds) nor Members are characterized - with rare exceptions - to be financially literate or experienced in public administration and less if it's new legislature, as is the case.
What we do have is way behind agency cooperation between the two powers, so I say that is not the best choice but to disappear into something effective and useful for Veracruz: What are work sessions, without rigieses ceremonial laying down the rules of the legislature, which previously exchanged documents with questions and reports on those issues to be addressed and that will not read at the meeting that much time is lost in these obsolete practices of dialogue.
The accountability and transparency to public affairs as the right to access to information, have nothing to do with the communication disorder that compliments luxury and protocol performed Members On the contrary, is in disarray and noise flourishes role in the simulation of accountability. Therefore, it is time to put a stop to the meetings of expense that becomes a spectacle, and it distorts the purpose of those meetings.
not this format allows for more presence in the full Congress and there is the experience of the U.S. House. In fact the powers of state to co-govern a society. Legislators can support the program and much of the Governor. They should do but in a thoughtful and based.
If instead of hearings are held quarterly meetings to work without media - to not riot ego - most will be the cooperation between the Legislative and the Executive. More organized will monitor the management function if there was a question or something to change, MEPs have an expensive apparatus is ORFISA specialists and a secretary of Control that should help alleviate the abysmal asymmetries of information and knowledge between the executive and legislative branches. If a
balance is positioned on one side the cost of such equipment and other support a diagnosis of knowledge that reveals the total number of questions from Members, insurance will give us public embarrassment to everyone! DA PENA
LEVEL WORK REAL QUESTIONS, gentlemen, it is WHAT YOU NEED!
http://despertartemprano.blogspot.com/
Email: romeo-gonzalez@hotmail.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment